8.06.2011

On Lists: Losing Sight of What Matters

Yesterday I published the Daemons list I intended to take to Hard Boyz next week.  Only problem is... it kinda sucked.





As Syaoran pointed out:

I'm over the moon that you decided to go with daemons, tho I'm a little surprised by your list. Your 1850 list is amazing, I thought you just add on from there.
His point is spot on: my 1850 list is as tight as it can be - there are no wasted points.  It's optimized.

So why did I think I could take my optimized list, add a some wasted Wargear and an entire unit I don't think is worthwhile, the Bloodletters, in the type of list I play and think it was good?

It might have been fine, as Round I is usually fairly easy, but then I ran into the Card Pimp in Question last night at the store.  He's playing a Blood Angels 3-Fisted Brick of an army, but with correct play I thought I'd be fine.

Well, I played correctly, but I wasn't.  My new dice let me down in stunning fashion, but I'm not the type of guy who wants to blame a bad result on luck, so I gave it some thought last night.  My conclusion?

The Daemons weren't optimized and couldn't absorb the bad luck.  Back to the drawing board I went, and this is better:




Da Warboss also made an interesting observation:

Why bother with daemons when GK's are going to be everywhere with their nemesis weapons? Stick to your wolves and leave the fun list for non-ard boy.
I like the Brotherhood, and I think they'd do just fine.  In fact, I may end up changing my mind after today's games and submitting them.  But I doubt it.

I'm still best with Daemons, and frankly most of the GK armies out there don't scare me.  The type of builds that scare the crap out of me just don't seem to be hitting the table, so I think I'll take my chances.

Thoughts?

12 comments:

Gonewild said...

Hey Brent,
Out of curiosity do you recall the Blood Angels list that you faced?

Magilla Gurilla said...

First off, your constant posting about Daemons (and Pat from 11th Company) is one of the reasons I have picked them up for my new (2nd)army...

...I like this list better than your last list. My limited experience has been that Flesh Hounds are a nasty, nasty tar-pit for GK with the 2+ invulnerable save.

However, I am surprised that you have not added any screamers of Tzeentch. Once again, I have limited experience with Daemons, but they not only function as a fantastic screening unit for your Fiends/Hounds, they can really make LR owners cry.

Just my 1.1 cent worth.

Shadowvast said...

Go with your Heart Brent. I know that sounds cheesy, but you love the Daemons. They work for you. So to drop another cliche, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".

Krisken said...

I like the Flesh Hounds as Grey Knight meta and additional speed, but still don't understand the large unit of Plaguebearers. I would think the points would be better spent either splitting the unit in half or adding Seekers for their assault grenades.

Anyways, hope this list works better for ya.

Brent said...

Warboss Stalin: What do you know?

(Ah, I'm glad you're back, and mean as ever!)

Krisken: Read the first scenario for Round I, then the choice of the tar pit PB's will make sense!

Damn The Valley said...

Honestly, I don't think GK's will be as much of a problem as some people tend to think. It might even be an advantage, because like all armies, they are still only as good as their player. And the inexperienced players out there will see it as an easy win since they are playing with GK's and make stupid choices, allowing you to get more blood for the blood god.

Da Warboss said...

That's pretty funny. I don't recall posting that it's still crap. Who's the poser?

Da Warboss said...

Oh by the way its very funny if you click on 'Warboss Stalin'. No doubt its one of Brent's gay ass-ociates up to no good

Brent said...

Well, I was stupid enough to click it. It was some bullshit gag site that dropped cookies that wouldn't let you leave.

Pretty shitty, whoever did it, but I'm deleting it now.

*sigh*

I hope that's not the latest Blogger joke.

Brent said...

I hope not, WB. Crappy thing for someone to do.

Probably some 16-year old mouth-breather, destined to stay a virgin until he gets curious about his teddy bear in late middle age.

Syaoran said...

The sign of a great player is someone who can take constructive feed back and work with it and not get offended or jump straight onto the defensive. After reading what you wrote in your opening comments for this blog is one of the main reason why I follow Strictly Average. Well done.

I tend to play in a lot of 2500 point tournaments which are mostly objective based and in my experience, 2 x 7 man plaguebeares units with 1 icon (optional) is a lot more effective then 1 x 15 man unit. You don’t want that 1 unit of plaguebearers to become redundant after that one scenario/mission is over with that you planed them for. Yes they may work well for that one missions, but trust me, after that mission is over with and your onto your next game, you’ll be thinking to yourself “man I wish I could split that unit”.

By splitting them and giving one unit an icon, you can still bring them down together forming your large tar pit unit, but you get the added benefit of making them more resourceful for other missions. Plus you can separate the gap between each unit just enough so they wont get double assaulted when holding an objective.

Other then that, the only other change I would consider is to drop a unit of flesh hounds, reduce the size of the other down to 8-6 and add 2 units screamers. In smaller point games, I would never touch them, but at the 2500 point level, they really do work wonders. Ohh and find the 5 points for the changeling.. You know how wonderfully they can be.

cirno-chan said...

I like your list, I could see the use of bloodletters being nothing but effective with the power weapons, your choices in units isn't something to laugh at dude, especially with what they give you.

(A new favorite!) Anon: I haven’t even bothered playing a game of 6th yet, cause I have read the rules, and actually understand how they interact with units. I know my armies no longer function how they should, and so I need to change them.

Strictly Average: 'cause 6-inches is all you get.

Stalking Jawaballs since 2009.

Jawaballs: "My butt just tightened up."

Brent, preferred 2-to-1 over Not Brent in a recent, scientific poll.

Brent: emptied the Kool Aid and DRINKING YOUR MILKSHAKE with an extra-long straw.

Unicorns don't exist.

Home of the Stormbuster, the Dyson Pattern Storm Raven.

I'm a comment whore and this whore is getting no play.

Not Brent hurts Brent's feelings.

I think, therefore I blog.

"You should stop writing for everyone else and worry about your crappy blog." - Anon.

Not Brent has been spotted lurking around with a green marker.

He's not like a bad guy from a cartoon, all devious but never quite evil, Not Brent is bad beans, man, bad beans.

Dethtron: "Again I feel obliged to remind you that trying to sound smart only works if you are."

MVB: "I am not one to join the unwashed masses of self-titled 40k experts out there distributing advice from their blogs about exactly how your list should be built..."

Shiner Bock on tap: that's how I choose hotels.

Strictly Average: The Home of Hugs and Gropings.

Don't feed the trolls!

MoD: "Welcome to Brent's head."

Competitive is Consistent.

Dethtron: "...you could use that extra time to figure out a way to get your panties unbunched and perform a sandectomy on your vagina."

Dethtron: “When calling someone an idiot, it's generally best to avoid making grammatical mistakes.”

Warboss Stalin: "You know, if it actually WAS funny, maybe I wouldn't mind."

Mike Brandt: "It's not a successful bachelor party if you don't misplace someone".

"The Master Manipulator (every store needs one): "...now, enough stroking."

Kirby: "I don't know about gropings. Seriously, Brent, keep it in the pants, please."

Loquacious: "No matter how hard I tried, I couldn't get Hugs & Gropings or Stalks Jawaballs into Brent's little tribute."

Captain Kellen: "I rate this article a Brent on the Faith Hill to Nancy Pelosi scale!"

Drathmere: "Come for the balls, stay for the Brent? Kind of disturbing, man."

Go no further, lest thee see something thine eyes would fain look past!

Isabelle: "So, thank you for supporting your local and not so local unicorns. A noble gesture like that can show some scared kids out there that they don't have to hide from everyone and it's ok to be who they really are."

There is nothing more interesting than We The People... in all our beautiful, ugly glory!

On Internet Advice: You see, I have an almost religious belief that's it's a huge, colossal waste of time.

...I think I'll call it the Gun Shy Pattern Stormbuster, because after the Internet destroyed my first humble effort, I find I'm a bit worried about the reaction to this one.

Lauby: "Is it left over from that time you thought that you could just complete step one 12 times to meet the mandates of that court order?"

Not Brent: "I guess we'll have to read on and find out. Signed, Not Brent. Especially today."

Cynthia Davis: "I think the scrolling text is from Glen Beck's new book."

Grimaldi: "Spamming certain units creates interesting possibilities but also fatal weaknesses."

Purgatus: "Math can inform decisions. It cannot make decisions."

Thoughts? Comments? Hugs and gropings?

You'd be that much quicker to figure out what I mean when I refer to a Unicorn if I covered it in a rainbow flag.

SinSynn: (To Brent) "Curse you and your insidious influence on the internets..."

Dave G (N++): "You know you're an internet celebrity when your following is more akin to tabloids."

I prefer the term Internet Personality (or IP) myself, seeing as how I coined it.

Lauby: "Your attempt to humanize him as failed. I feel nothing but scorn for his beard - it's like a warcrime or something."

BBF: "I've always thought you are a good player but I finally figured out that you are a great player. It's hard to see sometimes because your personality is engaging, sincere and quite charming - to me that is kind of a rare combination."

'Clearly cheating?' I didn't misspeak: you jumped to conclusions. If you'd like to apologize I'll be happy to send you an autographed picture of my ass.

Ass.

I thought I was doing alright before I realized I was losing.

Age and treachery beats youth and vigor every time.

Popular Posts