2.07.2010

Tournament Softscores?

Green Blowfly wrote a great post over on his blog, Terminus Est (the links in my blog list).  Check it out here.

It's always an interesting subject; I piped in with my 2-cents.

Brent said...
Man, soft scores are a tough call. I believe limits are okay, as long as you know about them in advance. I also don't mind rewarding painting and conversions, but I have a differing opinion about two things.

1) Composition. Personally, over the last few years I've changed my mind about this: I'm okay with any legal list a Codex can produce. I tend to think fluff is rewarded off the table for the most part.

2) Soft scores... that are too subjective, that is. I don't mind grading my opponent, but I think it should be limited and strictly controlled. The worst abuses I've seen in tournaments involved friends vote-blocking each other. That can be difficult to overcome.

Your advice about big tournaments is great. I've seen the same things, and my big-event experience doesn't match yours. You've got to advocate for yourself and get a judge involved if necessary.

So I hate to steal his topic, but it looks like I'm stealing his topic...  Thoughts?

3 comments:

Evil Homer said...

Hate comp, despise soft scores, and don't think painting/modeling should be included in tournament scores.

The game is the game. Rules are rules. What happens on the field has no bearing on how well I paint. If painting is required to enter great, I have no problem there, but it should have no bearing on final tournament scores.

Comp scores just given people at tournaments another angle to try and game. Remove comp and paint, let the games speak for themselves.

If you want to have a separate painting competition more power to you.

Big Whit said...

They should have another prize for best painted then.

Green Blow Fly said...

If there are no soft scores then there are some players who will cheat as much as they can because there is no penalty. That's the reason why I hate events like Ard Boyz and the to some extent but nearly as much the Gladiator. Soft scores force smart competitive players to be nice and play more fairly because they need those points to win a tournament. I have met many people who can every game by a massacre but they never win any awards except for best general. They get mad when they don't win any awards but to me it's their own fault because they turn a blind eye to the soft scores.

Soft scores can be gamed- everyone gives everyone a perfect score for sportsmanship in hopes they will max out in this category- clubs block vote for their members and chipmunk everyone else; etc. Like Brent has said the TOs should police this watching the scoring after each turn. If I am running a tournament and I see someone handing out everyone low soft scores you had better believe I will take them aside and ask why, and they better have a sound answer or will talk to their opponents. I let everyone know this well ahead of the tournament and I have found it really helps curb this type of abuse.

Comp scores and theme- I played strictly Blood Angels for over five years. After the PDF codex was released by GW it eventually became apparent that the only competitive build was to take Dante & Corbulo as your two HQ choices. I know for a fact my soft scores for theme/comp took a hit because a lot of players hate special characters for whatever reason and I had two in my army. I did a lot better when I ran Mephiston and a generic chaplain but after 5th edition was released Mephiston lost a lot of his effectiveness. Now I could blame GW for writing a codex that is limited BUT it was my choice to stick with Blood Angels and run the Dante/Corbulo combination. I could just as well play other armies and eventually after reading the Black Library fantasy novel Blood for the Blood God I decided to build a beautiful Khornate daemon army... My soft scores went through the roof and I started to win tournaments again even though in reality the daemon army is much more powerful than Blood Angels and also much easier to play. I am a lot happier now as a result of my decision to change armies. Perception is often not reality but it is what it is. If you look at the rules for the Indy GTs in the circuit the vast majority include some soft scores. I don't think that is going to change anytime soon in the US either. Theme/comp is a means of punishing players that bring WAAC/completely over the top armies. If you are a WAAC player you don't like comp/theme for just that reason but on the other hand it's possible to design and build armies that have both a strong theme and are very competitive.

If I don't like the scoring system for a tournament then I don't go. It's just that simple to me and I live in area where I can play in an RTT every weekend if I so desire.

G

(A new favorite!) Anon: I haven’t even bothered playing a game of 6th yet, cause I have read the rules, and actually understand how they interact with units. I know my armies no longer function how they should, and so I need to change them.

Strictly Average: 'cause 6-inches is all you get.

Stalking Jawaballs since 2009.

Jawaballs: "My butt just tightened up."

Brent, preferred 2-to-1 over Not Brent in a recent, scientific poll.

Brent: emptied the Kool Aid and DRINKING YOUR MILKSHAKE with an extra-long straw.

Unicorns don't exist.

Home of the Stormbuster, the Dyson Pattern Storm Raven.

I'm a comment whore and this whore is getting no play.

Not Brent hurts Brent's feelings.

I think, therefore I blog.

"You should stop writing for everyone else and worry about your crappy blog." - Anon.

Not Brent has been spotted lurking around with a green marker.

He's not like a bad guy from a cartoon, all devious but never quite evil, Not Brent is bad beans, man, bad beans.

Dethtron: "Again I feel obliged to remind you that trying to sound smart only works if you are."

MVB: "I am not one to join the unwashed masses of self-titled 40k experts out there distributing advice from their blogs about exactly how your list should be built..."

Shiner Bock on tap: that's how I choose hotels.

Strictly Average: The Home of Hugs and Gropings.

Don't feed the trolls!

MoD: "Welcome to Brent's head."

Competitive is Consistent.

Dethtron: "...you could use that extra time to figure out a way to get your panties unbunched and perform a sandectomy on your vagina."

Dethtron: “When calling someone an idiot, it's generally best to avoid making grammatical mistakes.”

Warboss Stalin: "You know, if it actually WAS funny, maybe I wouldn't mind."

Mike Brandt: "It's not a successful bachelor party if you don't misplace someone".

"The Master Manipulator (every store needs one): "...now, enough stroking."

Kirby: "I don't know about gropings. Seriously, Brent, keep it in the pants, please."

Loquacious: "No matter how hard I tried, I couldn't get Hugs & Gropings or Stalks Jawaballs into Brent's little tribute."

Captain Kellen: "I rate this article a Brent on the Faith Hill to Nancy Pelosi scale!"

Drathmere: "Come for the balls, stay for the Brent? Kind of disturbing, man."

Go no further, lest thee see something thine eyes would fain look past!

Isabelle: "So, thank you for supporting your local and not so local unicorns. A noble gesture like that can show some scared kids out there that they don't have to hide from everyone and it's ok to be who they really are."

There is nothing more interesting than We The People... in all our beautiful, ugly glory!

On Internet Advice: You see, I have an almost religious belief that's it's a huge, colossal waste of time.

...I think I'll call it the Gun Shy Pattern Stormbuster, because after the Internet destroyed my first humble effort, I find I'm a bit worried about the reaction to this one.

Lauby: "Is it left over from that time you thought that you could just complete step one 12 times to meet the mandates of that court order?"

Not Brent: "I guess we'll have to read on and find out. Signed, Not Brent. Especially today."

Cynthia Davis: "I think the scrolling text is from Glen Beck's new book."

Grimaldi: "Spamming certain units creates interesting possibilities but also fatal weaknesses."

Purgatus: "Math can inform decisions. It cannot make decisions."

Thoughts? Comments? Hugs and gropings?

You'd be that much quicker to figure out what I mean when I refer to a Unicorn if I covered it in a rainbow flag.

SinSynn: (To Brent) "Curse you and your insidious influence on the internets..."

Dave G (N++): "You know you're an internet celebrity when your following is more akin to tabloids."

I prefer the term Internet Personality (or IP) myself, seeing as how I coined it.

Lauby: "Your attempt to humanize him as failed. I feel nothing but scorn for his beard - it's like a warcrime or something."

BBF: "I've always thought you are a good player but I finally figured out that you are a great player. It's hard to see sometimes because your personality is engaging, sincere and quite charming - to me that is kind of a rare combination."

'Clearly cheating?' I didn't misspeak: you jumped to conclusions. If you'd like to apologize I'll be happy to send you an autographed picture of my ass.

Ass.

I thought I was doing alright before I realized I was losing.

Age and treachery beats youth and vigor every time.

Popular Posts