Green Blowfly wrote a great post over on his blog, Terminus Est (the links in my blog list). Check it out here.
It's always an interesting subject; I piped in with my 2-cents.
Man, soft scores are a tough call. I believe limits are okay, as long as you know about them in advance. I also don't mind rewarding painting and conversions, but I have a differing opinion about two things.
1) Composition. Personally, over the last few years I've changed my mind about this: I'm okay with any legal list a Codex can produce. I tend to think fluff is rewarded off the table for the most part.
2) Soft scores... that are too subjective, that is. I don't mind grading my opponent, but I think it should be limited and strictly controlled. The worst abuses I've seen in tournaments involved friends vote-blocking each other. That can be difficult to overcome.
Your advice about big tournaments is great. I've seen the same things, and my big-event experience doesn't match yours. You've got to advocate for yourself and get a judge involved if necessary.
So I hate to steal his topic, but it looks like I'm stealing his topic... Thoughts?
"If there is one thing we here at Privateer Press pride ourselves on, it's listening to our audience. You guys and gals have been d...
For better or worse, here's the updated Storm Raven.
So after a few weeks of downtime I finally uncollapsed the collapsible table and started work on the hobby again. It's fair to say Str...
On Friday we our event kicked off in earnest, and each participant has three games to play at 1000 points in the month of December. I, as t...