1.13.2012

Necrons: Competitive or Crap, Part II

I posted my current 'competitive' list yesterday, and I got to test it against the Client Pimp in Question.

First, the comments!

Tao, from Tides of Madness, noted:

Convert one of your Particle beamers to a Gloom Prism on your Spyders. This will give you a 4+ Null to any force jibbing on the unit and also give you wound allocation (Beamer, Gloom, Naked)

With the 15 points you get from the conversion give yourself a 3 Whipcoil and 1 Partical Caster. This gives you 3 Whips and for better lack of terms 2 red shirts from wound allocation. In practice i find 3 whip coils has been the lowest amount to spread Inn 1 across the unit with the placement (alternating Whips).

With this change two of your units get wound allocation for some increased survivablity, and your spiders (who lack an invul) get force jibb protection.



I thought this was a very practical suggestion.  I actually intended to include a Gloom Prism on one of the guns both for psychic defense and allocation, but I had to cut it when trimming the list.  Practically speaking, I usually have only two rounds to farm Scarabs until I have to use them, at which point rolling 1's for wounds becomes less of an issue.

I'll be breaking down a Wraith to include a 3rd Whip Coil.

Darkwynn said:

I still think Necrons are one of the worst books GW has made in years. Too few units, too expenaive, the stats and assaulting issues are still there.

Looking through the 6th edition book also I don't see them being fixed by that. They suffer from major design flaw.

I'm not sure what to say to this except I don't agree.  Nick is much better at breaking down numbers and optimizing lists than I am - he's a lot like Evil Homer or the Client Pimp in Question like that - but I'm not sure Necrons are so easily quantified.

Destroyers are overpriced.  The Triarch options are also, in my opinion, and the Ghost Ark, but even then I don't believe it tells the whole story.  I've said from the beginning Necrons look to reward a mixed arms approach, and now I include the choice of Tesla and Gauss in that equation.

As my list demonstrates, I love the basic Necron Warrior, and I don't at all agree that a 5-strong Warrior or Immortal unit is the 'standard,' the former being a throw-away unit.  I'm liking beefy Warriors and trim Immortals...

...and the Tesla Carbine is ichiban!  In a practice game last night, my two 5-strong units consistently rolled five or so wounds against a Marine each turn, good for mopping up shots.

Last night I played the Client Pimp in Questions Purifier list:



You can review my list from yesterday's post, but on paper this army looks the stronger.  Tye made a comment before we began that he worried my list would suffer this weekend, at the tournament, once my tricks were known.

Speaks of confidence!  To be fair though, I thought I was at a huge disadvantage.

Not so much.  It was Capture and Control and Tye did narrowly burgle a win in Turn 5.  Had the game continued, I would likely have tabled him.  He had one Purifier on my objective facing down a 10-strong Warriors unit with Crytek, a Monolith, and a 5-strong Immortals.  He had two Rhinos, one Immobalized, and Crowe.

I also still had the other Monolith, three Spyders, and a 20-strong unit with the Overlord, Cryptek, and Warriors!  I was on his objective and he contested at the bottom of Turn 5 with a Rhino.

Don't get me wrong - it was a brilliant win and a great game, but it wasn't a blowout - in fact, the Kill Points and Victory Points were rather lopsided.  He simply gambled on the game ending early and won, and that's part of the game.

So why did I think I was at a big disadvantage?  Force Weapons.  Purifiers.  4d6 Armor Penetration each round from the Vindy.  Psycannons rending armor like tissue paper..!  And those things happened.

But I have toys, too!

More in Part III...

5 comments:

#2501 said...

I gotta admit, I'm perplexed by your decision to take dual Monoliths and not triple Annihilation barges, especially in a list under 2k.

Kepora said...

"I still think Necrons are one of the worst books GW has made in years. Too few units, too expenaive, the stats and assaulting issuues are still there.

Looking through the 6th edition book also I don't see them being fixed by that. They suffer from major design flaw."

My Tau and Chaos armies would like to have a word with him.

Really though, I'm getting sick of the people whom claim that the new necrons "suck" just because they're aren't easy-to-use point-and-click armies like Space Wolves or Grey Knights.

Weight Loss Buddies said...

The Necrons are a number of Immortal steel enthusiast, designed from the Necrontyr and People events. They have lain inactive in their stasis-tombs.

Timber said...

^^ That right there? Best spam ever.

Brent said...

No doubt!

(A new favorite!) Anon: I haven’t even bothered playing a game of 6th yet, cause I have read the rules, and actually understand how they interact with units. I know my armies no longer function how they should, and so I need to change them.

Strictly Average: 'cause 6-inches is all you get.

Stalking Jawaballs since 2009.

Jawaballs: "My butt just tightened up."

Brent, preferred 2-to-1 over Not Brent in a recent, scientific poll.

Brent: emptied the Kool Aid and DRINKING YOUR MILKSHAKE with an extra-long straw.

Unicorns don't exist.

Home of the Stormbuster, the Dyson Pattern Storm Raven.

I'm a comment whore and this whore is getting no play.

Not Brent hurts Brent's feelings.

I think, therefore I blog.

"You should stop writing for everyone else and worry about your crappy blog." - Anon.

Not Brent has been spotted lurking around with a green marker.

He's not like a bad guy from a cartoon, all devious but never quite evil, Not Brent is bad beans, man, bad beans.

Dethtron: "Again I feel obliged to remind you that trying to sound smart only works if you are."

MVB: "I am not one to join the unwashed masses of self-titled 40k experts out there distributing advice from their blogs about exactly how your list should be built..."

Shiner Bock on tap: that's how I choose hotels.

Strictly Average: The Home of Hugs and Gropings.

Don't feed the trolls!

MoD: "Welcome to Brent's head."

Competitive is Consistent.

Dethtron: "...you could use that extra time to figure out a way to get your panties unbunched and perform a sandectomy on your vagina."

Dethtron: “When calling someone an idiot, it's generally best to avoid making grammatical mistakes.”

Warboss Stalin: "You know, if it actually WAS funny, maybe I wouldn't mind."

Mike Brandt: "It's not a successful bachelor party if you don't misplace someone".

"The Master Manipulator (every store needs one): "...now, enough stroking."

Kirby: "I don't know about gropings. Seriously, Brent, keep it in the pants, please."

Loquacious: "No matter how hard I tried, I couldn't get Hugs & Gropings or Stalks Jawaballs into Brent's little tribute."

Captain Kellen: "I rate this article a Brent on the Faith Hill to Nancy Pelosi scale!"

Drathmere: "Come for the balls, stay for the Brent? Kind of disturbing, man."

Go no further, lest thee see something thine eyes would fain look past!

Isabelle: "So, thank you for supporting your local and not so local unicorns. A noble gesture like that can show some scared kids out there that they don't have to hide from everyone and it's ok to be who they really are."

There is nothing more interesting than We The People... in all our beautiful, ugly glory!

On Internet Advice: You see, I have an almost religious belief that's it's a huge, colossal waste of time.

...I think I'll call it the Gun Shy Pattern Stormbuster, because after the Internet destroyed my first humble effort, I find I'm a bit worried about the reaction to this one.

Lauby: "Is it left over from that time you thought that you could just complete step one 12 times to meet the mandates of that court order?"

Not Brent: "I guess we'll have to read on and find out. Signed, Not Brent. Especially today."

Cynthia Davis: "I think the scrolling text is from Glen Beck's new book."

Grimaldi: "Spamming certain units creates interesting possibilities but also fatal weaknesses."

Purgatus: "Math can inform decisions. It cannot make decisions."

Thoughts? Comments? Hugs and gropings?

You'd be that much quicker to figure out what I mean when I refer to a Unicorn if I covered it in a rainbow flag.

SinSynn: (To Brent) "Curse you and your insidious influence on the internets..."

Dave G (N++): "You know you're an internet celebrity when your following is more akin to tabloids."

I prefer the term Internet Personality (or IP) myself, seeing as how I coined it.

Lauby: "Your attempt to humanize him as failed. I feel nothing but scorn for his beard - it's like a warcrime or something."

BBF: "I've always thought you are a good player but I finally figured out that you are a great player. It's hard to see sometimes because your personality is engaging, sincere and quite charming - to me that is kind of a rare combination."

'Clearly cheating?' I didn't misspeak: you jumped to conclusions. If you'd like to apologize I'll be happy to send you an autographed picture of my ass.

Ass.

I thought I was doing alright before I realized I was losing.

Age and treachery beats youth and vigor every time.

Popular Posts